Brendon Hartley, Toro Rosso, Shanghai International Circuit, 2018

Paddock Diary: Chinese Grand Prix day two

Paddock Diary

Posted on

| Written by

A loose wheel is a problem that can be solved but what to do about a driver unlucky enough to hit two birds in a week? @DieterRencken takes us behind the scenes at the Chinese Grand Prix.

Friday 13 April, 8am

Sleep during Asian races is a balancing act for Europe-based journalists. Go to bed too early and you wake up all refreshed after a good night’s sleep, but pay the price when you return to home as your body clock has grown accustomed to an early time zone. Go to bed at the equivalent of European time – 11pm in Europe being 5am here in Shanghai – and you either have little sleep or miss half the day.

The trick is to split the difference, and sleep from 2am local time to 8am, then have a quick shower and breakfast before catching a 9am shuttle. Once back home it takes but a day or two to return to “normality”. That allows but six hours of sleep, but it beats staring at ceilings for four hours for a week at either end…

So I was up and away at 0900 having had breakfast in the hotel rather than attend Williams’ traditional British media breakfast as I usually do. Again I was impressed with the fare on offer in the hotel – it’s a far cry from the runny eggs and lukewarm noodles we were served when first F1 hit the country.

10am

A scratchy first practice session as teams squeeze as much running as possible into the session as possible ahead of expected rain during the afternoon’s running. Brendon Hartley must have felt a sense of déjà vu when he struck a bird – the hapless New Zealander hit a feathered creature during Q1 in Bahrain. Has the notoriously wretched luck that followed his compatriot Chris Amon in F1 found a new target?

12pm

Maurizio Arrivabene, Ferrari, 2018
Arrivabene characteristically gave away little
FIA team principals’ media conference, where, as expected, the bosses are largely evasive when questioned about the Liberty proposals for a post-2020 F1. Maurizio Arrivabene states that it’s the task of Ferrari CEO Sergio Marchionne – he of long-standing threats to pull the Scuderia out of F1 – to comment. That suggests Ferrari is unhappy…

1pm

After interviewing Fred Vasseur at Sauber I head for Mercedes and lunch. The Three Pointed Star generously lays on meals for the media in its hospitality – always much appreciated, thank you! Today’s dish was grilled halibut, mediterranean veggies and country potatoes, followed by fresh fruit salad.

2pm

The talk of FP2 is McLaren’s loose wheel, the sixth wheel-related incident to hit F1 since pre-season testing began. It is, frankly, a ridiculous situation, and F1 must surely start looking at standardised fastening systems – which would subject all teams to a single, proven system, probably at the fraction of the cost of each team developing their own systems. True, pit stops are a part of F1, but common systems would ensure the human element plays a bigger role.

5:30pm

The rain arrived at the end of second practice and while interviewing Renault’s Bob Bell an ear-bursting bolt of lightning strikes. “I thought that was Donald Trump getting angry; he did say they were coming…” grins the Belfast-born engineer once the shock of the strike resides.

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

6:30pm

Toro Rosso, Bahrain International Circuit, 2018
Toro Rosso had much to celebrate in Bahrain
An exclusive interview with James Key, who is quietly proud of Toro Rosso’s fourth place in Bahrain after cramming a change of power unit into five months after the team’s late decision to switch from Renault power to Honda. During the chat he mentions “Formula 1’s DNA” before apologising for using the hackneyed term.

Interview done, we discuss whether F1 really does have “DNA”, or whether it’s just a convenient phrase bandied about by change deniers…

We also discuss the natural world, in which the DNA of a species drives its evolution, which in turn enables it to survive. When that process stops, the species faces extinction – as so many have over the ages. Thus F1’s DNA consists not of strands such as customer cars (or not) or V10 engines (or hybrids) or two-hour races (or two heats), but its double helix of constant evolution measured over a period of seven decades.

Thus, by extension, every regulation change since 1950 has directly contributed to F1’s survival, often against the odds. When that stops, F1 dies. Food for thought when the FIA next introduces a new rule…

2018 Chinese Grand Prix

Browse all 2018 Chinese Grand Prix articles

Author information

Dieter Rencken
Dieter Rencken has held full FIA Formula 1 media accreditation since 2000, during which period he has reported from over 300 grands prix, plus...

Got a potential story, tip or enquiry? Find out more about RaceFans and contact us here.

9 comments on “Paddock Diary: Chinese Grand Prix day two”

  1. “Dear diary,

    I am super sad, why am I so slow? My daddy is really rich, and I really really want to accomplish something with his money. I don’t really know what I’m doing, I kind of don’t want to work hard so I need to blame other people. I hope to see sparkles and butterflies tomorrow.
    Yours truly from a stroll away. Stroll. “

  2. If Stroll does not up his game Saturday and Sunday……he will be history..
    ps Dieter I would love your job…

  3. Hartley is so unlucky that he indeed deserves the Amon analogy. I’m sure he’ll eventually match Gasly, but will he actually get anything close to a 4th place. Ickx came into Ferrari and won almost immediately following a suggestion by Amon to run wet tyres, that’s Amon’s kind of luck.

  4. Re: 2 pm
    Why a spec wheel nut? So, the tyres are not made by the teams (well, ok, they never were), the rims? Brake discs, calipers and pads? What do the teams fabricate in this subsystem besides the hub and nut (and extraneous to this discussion, brake cooling ducts). What could probably be spec has nothing to do with the car; but the pit ingress/egress technology and management.

    1. @boomerzoomer
      I guess the nut/gun and electronic systems related to the lights could all be standardized. They have a system to retain the nut in the wheel too, don’t they?

      Anyway, the aim would be to make the system fail-safe, rather than reasonably reliable but fast.

      1. exactly @george, a FIA regulated common hub/nut system, targetted at max safety (for example needing more rotations to fasten on, so that it is less prone to cross threading) and then produced by a designated company for the whole grid makes a lot of sense.

        It would help ensure teams cannot try to be smarter than is good for safety, and if a pitstop takes a second more on average, it won’t change too much in the competition, since that goes for everyone.

  5. Stroll will remain in F1 while “Daddy” keeps paying.
    Does he virtually own the Williams team?

    1. Might have been cheaper in the long run to buy Williams rather than subsidise them. I take this as karma (metaphorically) for all those WDCs they gave the flick.

  6. @dieterrencken. Thanks for mentioning the 70 years of F1 evolution, I find the constant references to F1’s DNA usually refers to the gimmicks Bernie introduced in an effort to get more interest in USA rather than the less commercial 1st. half of F1’s history, not to mention F. libre.

Comments are closed.